Jira Alternatives

Jira, an agile project management tool, has been the go-to for many software development teams. While the software offers a broad spectrum of project management functionality, its steep learning curve and per user pricing have encouraged companies to seek flexible project management tools that suit their specific needs.

Jira Alternatives: An In-depth Look at Competitors in Project Management Software

In this blog, we'll explore some of the best Jira alternatives for managing projects.

Trello

Trello, a popular project management tool, serves as an alternative to Jira, especially for smaller teams with less complex project management requirements.

Trello offers a user-friendly interface with easy drag-and-drop functionality. Its intuitive interface simplifies task management, making it easy for teams to track progress and to manage projects across multiple projects simultaneously.

One of Trello's selling points is its free plan, accommodating up to five users, which includes unlimited projects and users. While the free plan provides basic project planning functionality, Trello's paid plans (business and the enterprise plan) offer advanced features like unlimited boards, custom fields, automated workflows, and more.

Asana

Asana is another agile project management software that's recognized as a Jira alternative. Asana has a more comprehensive feature set, providing Gantt charts, resource planning, and portfolio management. Asana's free plan accommodates unlimited users, but the advanced features require a paid plan.

A user-friendly interface and seamless integration with tools like Google Calendar and Google Drive make Asana a strong contender for teams that prioritize user experience and collaboration.

With Asana, teams can create project templates, plan their resources, see project status, and keep track of project progress using Gantt charts.

Microsoft Azure DevOps (formerly Team Foundation Server)

Microsoft Azure DevOps is an alternative to Jira for complex software development projects. It combines the power of cloud-based collaboration software with an impressive set of project management tools.

Its functionality extends beyond basic project management to include bug tracking tools, issue tracking, and more.

Azure DevOps offers seamless integration with other Microsoft tools, making it a solid option for teams already immersed in the Microsoft ecosystem.

Agile project management teams can particularly benefit from the tool's custom workflows, Kanban boards, and burndown charts.

Monday.com

Monday.com is another agile project management tool that's gaining popularity as a Jira alternative. It provides a unique blend of features that boost team collaboration and streamline project management.

Its software provides an intuitive interface that does repetitive tasks and helps teams manage multiple projects while tracking their time efficiently.

With monday.com, you can enjoy a free trial, offering a taste of the software’s features. The platform provides flexible per user per month pricing tiers, from basic to enterprise plans.

These tiers offer everything from project templates to resource management, making monday.com a strong Jira alternative for businesses of all sizes.

ClickUp

ClickUp is a robust project management software that includes all the features you'd expect in an agile project management tool, including custom workflows, bug tracking, and unlimited projects even on its free plan.

One of the best Jira alternatives, ClickUp offers a blend of project management, task management, and time tracking in one place.

Its intuitive interface, coupled with a range of project management functionality, makes it an ideal tool for teams seeking to both project plan and streamline their workflows.

Pivotal Tracker

Pivotal Tracker is an agile project management software that's particularly well-suited for software development teams. Like Jira, it offers features like bug tracking, workflow management, and task management.

However, Pivotal Tracker emphasizes a more simplified, story-based approach to time tracking and project management.

This tool also offers a free trial and a variety of paid plans to cater to different team sizes and needs. It's worth considering for teams seeking a more streamlined, focused approach to managing agile projects.

In summary, while Jira remains a comprehensive project management tool, there are numerous Jira alternatives that offer a diverse range of features, from basic task management to complex project planning.

By considering factors like pricing, learning curve, and integration capabilities, you can find a project management tool that perfectly fits your business plan and team's needs.

VersionOne

VersionOne is an all-in-one agile project management tool that can serve as a comprehensive Jira alternative. This software provides project management, issue tracking, and workflow automation tools that are flexible enough to fit any agile methodology.

Feature Comparison

• Agile Support:
• Both VersionOne and Jira offer robust support for agile project management, including Scrum and Kanban methodologies. They provide features like sprint planning, user stories, and backlogs.
• Interface and Usability: Jira is known for its customizable but somewhat complex interface, which can have a steep learning curve for new users. On the other hand, VersionOne offers a more streamlined and intuitive interface, which can make it easier to navigate and use for some teams.
• Integration: Jira has strong integration capabilities, particularly with other Atlassian products like Bitbucket and Confluence. VersionOne also offers numerous integrations with other tools, including popular ones like Jenkins, Git, and Salesforce.
• Customization: Both tools offer high levels of customization. Jira is known for its flexible workflows and custom fields, while VersionOne allows users to tailor their workspace to their specific process.
  

Pricing Comparison

Atlassian Jira uses a per-user pricing model, which can become quite expensive for larger teams. On the other hand, VersionOne (now part of Digital.ai) does not publicly disclose its pricing, but reviews suggest it is competitive and sometimes better than Jira for larger organizations.

User Feedback

Jira enjoys widespread usage, particularly among software development teams, and has a larger user base compared to VersionOne. However, some users find Jira's interface complex and difficult to navigate.

VersionOne users often praise its user-friendly interface and excellent customer support. However, some users wish for more advanced reporting features, an area where Jira excels.

Basecamp

Based on customer ratings, Basecamp is a user-friendly project management software that's popular for its simplicity and intuitive design. Its features like to-do lists, message boards, schedules, and automated check-ins make it an ideal tool for managing projects and team collaboration.

Feature Comparison

• Task Management: Both Basecamp and Jira provide robust task management features. Jira focuses more on complex project management with detailed issue and bug tracking, making it ideal for software development teams. Basecamp, on the other hand, is more straightforward and is excellent for managing tasks and to-dos across a broad range of industries.
• Agile Support: Jira shines in its support for Agile and Scrum methodologies, providing features like sprint planning, user stories, and backlogs. Basecamp does not natively support Agile frameworks but remains a flexible tool for managing workflows and tasks.
• Interface and Usability: Basecamp prides itself on its intuitive, user-friendly interface, making it easy to onboard new team members. Jira's interface is more complex due to its extensive functionality, which can be a hurdle for new users.
• Collaboration: Both tools emphasize team collaboration but in different ways. Basecamp offers features like message boards, real-time chat, and automatic check-in questions to keep the team in sync. Jira focuses on collaboration through shared workflows, issue tracking, and development progress visibility.

Pricing Comparison

Jira operates on a per-user pricing model, which can be expensive for larger teams. Basecamp charges a flat fee of $99 per month for unlimited users and all features, making it potentially more cost-effective for larger organizations.

User Feedback

Jira, particularly popular among software development teams, has a larger user base compared to Basecamp. However, users often mention a steep learning curve due to its intricate and sometimes overly complex interface.

Basecamp users frequently praise its simplicity, ease of use, and flat-rate pricing model. Some users, though, wish for more in-depth features, particularly for project scheduling and resource management, areas where Jira typically excels.

LiquidPlanner

LiquidPlanner is an online project management software that provides businesses with features like resource management, project portfolios, and smart schedules. Its robust predictive scheduling engine and intuitive drag-and-drop interface make it an appealing Jira alternative.

Feature Comparison

• Task and Project Management: Both LiquidPlanner and Jira offer comprehensive task and project management features. However, they approach it differently. Jira is tailored more towards agile project management with its scrum and kanban boards, making it an ideal fit for software development teams. LiquidPlanner, on the other hand, uses a dynamic methodology that automatically adjusts your schedule based on project priorities and team’s capacity, making it a powerful tool for managing multiple projects across different teams.
• Estimation and Scheduling: This is where LiquidPlanner stands out. Its predictive, resource-based scheduling engine and ranged estimates help teams see potential bottlenecks and risks ahead of time. On the other hand, while Jira does provide scheduling and estimation tools, they're not as advanced or automatic as LiquidPlanner's.
• Interface and Usability: Jira's interface is highly customizable but can be complex, which might be overwhelming for new users. LiquidPlanner offers a more intuitive, albeit less customizable, interface that new users may find easier to navigate.
• Collaboration: Both tools offer solid collaboration features, including comment threads and document sharing. However, Jira, with its seamless integration with Confluence and other Atlassian tools, may provide a more integrated environment for software development teams.

Pricing Comparison

Jira operates on a per-user pricing model, starting with a free plan for up to 10 users. LiquidPlanner, on the other hand, uses package-based pricing, starting at $45 per user per month (with a minimum of 5 users). This could make LiquidPlanner more expensive, especially for smaller teams.

User Feedback

Jira's user base is quite extensive, particularly in the software development realm. The tool's flexibility and comprehensive feature set are frequently praised, but some users find it has a steep learning curve.

LiquidPlanner users appreciate its robust scheduling features and predictive capabilities. However, the higher cost and the lack of a free plan are often pointed out as downsides.

Crocagile

Crocagile provides a flexible agile software solution that is a suitable alternative for smaller teams or startups. Its features include custom workflows, task management, and a user-friendly interface.

Feature Comparison

• Agile Support: Both Crocagile and Jira are designed with agile teams in mind. Jira offers comprehensive support for Scrum, Kanban, and other agile methodologies, with features like user stories, backlogs, and sprints. Crocagile also supports agile workflows but does so with a much simpler, less cluttered interface.
• Interface and Usability: Jira's interface is customizable but can be complex, which might be a bit overwhelming for new users. Crocagile, in contrast, emphasizes simplicity and ease-of-use, making it an excellent option for teams new to agile project management or those preferring a less complex tool.
• Collaboration: Jira offers robust collaboration features, such as Confluence integration for knowledge management and Bitbucket integration for version control. Crocagile focuses on improving team engagement and offers a social media-like interface that encourages communication and collaboration.
• Gamification: A unique feature of Crocagile is its gamification of agile project management. It awards points for completed tasks and encourages friendly competition among team members, which can boost motivation and productivity.

Pricing Comparison

Jira uses a per-user pricing model, with a free version available for small teams and scalable plans for larger ones. Crocagile, on the other hand, offers a flat rate of $8 per user per month with a minimum of 5 users. Depending on the size of your team, one might be more cost-effective than the other.

User Feedback

Jira is widely used, especially among software development teams, but its steep learning curve can be a drawback for some users.

On the other hand, Crocagile users appreciate its simplicity and the gamification element, though some users may wish for more advanced features and customizability.

Mavenlink

Mavenlink is a platform designed for service organizations that require a blend of project management, resource planning, collaboration, and financial tools.

It offers robust project management functionality, making it a worthy contender as a Jira alternative.

Feature Comparison

• Project Management: Both Mavenlink and Jira offer comprehensive project management features. However, while Jira is heavily focused on software development and agile project management, Mavenlink is more broadly applicable and designed to suit a wide range of industries.
• Resource Management: Mavenlink shines when it comes to resource management. It offers powerful features like resource forecasting, capacity planning, and utilization reporting. While Jira has some resource management capabilities, it's not as comprehensive as Mavenlink in this regard.
• Interface and Usability: Jira offers a highly customizable interface but can be complex and may present a steep learning curve for some users. Mavenlink offers an intuitive, easy-to-use interface that provides a seamless user experience.
• Collaboration and Communication: Both tools facilitate team collaboration, but they approach it differently. Jira focuses on collaboration within the context of issues and projects, while Mavenlink provides a more integrated approach, combining project management with team collaboration, including real-time communication and file sharing.

Pricing Comparison

Jira follows a per-user pricing model with a free tier for small teams and paid plans that offer more advanced features.

Mavenlink, however, uses a tier-based pricing model, starting with a professional plan and scaling up to more advanced plans that include business intelligence, advanced resource planning, and more.

User Feedback

Jira, primarily used by software development teams, has a vast user base. However, the tool's complexity and steep learning curve are frequently mentioned by its users.

Mavenlink users frequently praise the tool's comprehensive project and resource management features. Some users, however, note that it can be expensive, especially for smaller teams or organizations.

Wrike

Wrike is a leading work management solution that offers visibility and control over your tasks. With features like Gantt charts, real-time updates, and resource management, it's a solid Jira alternative for businesses of all sizes.

Feature Comparison

• Project Management: Both Wrike and Jira are equipped with robust project management features, but they cater to different audiences. While Jira is more focused on agile software development teams with its scrum and kanban boards, Wrike provides a more general project management solution suitable for marketing, creative and product development teams.
• Interface and Usability: Jira offers a highly customizable interface, which can be complex and may present a steep learning curve for some users. In contrast, Wrike provides a more intuitive, easy-to-navigate interface with a folder structure that allows easy organization of tasks and projects.
• Collaboration: Both tools provide strong collaboration features. However, Wrike offers a broader set of collaboration tools such as real-time editing, document versioning, and live activity stream, which might be more suitable for creative and collaborative teams.
• Integration: Jira integrates seamlessly with other Atlassian tools and offers a vast marketplace of add-ons. Wrike, on the other hand, provides a wide array of integrations with popular tools like Google Drive, Microsoft Teams, Slack, and Adobe Creative Cloud.

Pricing Comparison

Jira follows a per-user pricing model with a free plan available for small teams and scalable plans for larger ones.

Wrike, however, offers both per-user and tier-based pricing with a free plan for small teams and more advanced plans that offer more sophisticated features.

User Feedback

Jira's flexibility and comprehensive feature set are appreciated among its extensive user base, particularly in the software development realm. However, some users find it complex and hard to master.

Wrike users commend its intuitive interface, powerful features, and robust integration capabilities. However, some users mention that its extensive features may feel overwhelming at first.

Infinity

Infinity offers a flexible project management tool that can be customized to suit any team's workflow. Its adaptable structure allows for unlimited customization, making it a viable alternative to more rigid tools like Jira.

Feature Comparison

• Project Management: Jira is built for software development and caters to agile methodologies like Scrum and Kanban, offering robust features such as bug and issue tracking, sprint planning, and more. Infinity, on the other hand, is a flexible project management tool that supports various types of projects and businesses. It provides customizable structures to help you organize tasks, files, ideas, notes, clients, and more.
• Interface and Usability: Jira offers a highly customizable interface, but its complexity can present a steep learning curve. Infinity stands out with a clean, intuitive interface and is designed to be user-friendly, making it accessible to all users regardless of technical expertise.
• Collaboration: Both tools offer collaboration features. Jira’s focus is more on project and issue-based collaboration, while Infinity allows real-time collaboration and comments on all items, providing a more general solution for team collaboration.
• Customization: Infinity really shines when it comes to customization. It offers an extensive range of customizable fields and views (like Table, Kanban, Calendar, List), which allows you to shape the tool to your needs. While Jira also has customizability, it is more focused on workflows.

Pricing Comparison

Jira follows a per-user pricing model, with a free plan for small teams and more feature-rich paid plans. Infinity, however, adopts a unique lifetime pricing model.

You make a one-time payment and gain lifetime access to their services, which could be a cost-effective solution for long-term use.

User Feedback

Jira is widely used and recognized in the software development industry, but its complexity and steep learning curve can be a barrier for some users.

Infinity users appreciate its intuitive interface, the flexibility it offers, and its lifetime pricing model. However, some users may find the array of customization options overwhelming initially.

nTask

nTask is a smart task management software, offering a host of features like task assignments, Gantt charts, time tracking, and issue tracking.

Its comprehensive functionality makes it a valuable tool for teams seeking an alternative to Jira.

Feature Comparison

• Project Management: While Jira is renowned for catering to software development teams with features designed around Scrum, Kanban, and other agile methodologies, nTask is a comprehensive project management tool suitable for a broad array of industries. It offers task management, project planning, time tracking, and issue management features.
• Interface and Usability: Jira's interface is highly customizable but can be quite complex, which may present a steep learning curve for new users. nTask, on the other hand, offers a cleaner, more intuitive interface that emphasizes user-friendliness, making it easier for teams to get started.
• Collaboration and Communication: Both tools offer collaboration features, but they do so in different ways. Jira's collaboration features are designed around issues and agile boards, while nTask offers team collaboration through shared tasks, projects, and meetings, which can be more appealing to non-software teams.
• Integration: While Jira boasts seamless integration with other Atlassian products and a marketplace of add-ons, nTask offers integrations with popular tools like Slack, Google Calendar, and Zoom.

Pricing Comparison

Jira's pricing is per-user-based with a free plan for small teams and more feature-rich paid plans for larger ones. In contrast, nTask provides a free plan with basic project management features and a premium plan that includes more advanced functionality.

User Feedback

Jira's user base often praises its extensive feature set and integrations but mentions its complexity as a drawback. Conversely, nTask users appreciate its user-friendly interface, affordable pricing, and comprehensive features, but some mention that it could offer more in-depth integrations.

Bugzilla

Bugzilla is an open-source tracking system designed specifically for bug tracking. While its focus is narrower than comprehensive project management tools like Jira, it remains a viable alternative for teams seeking a simple, dedicated bug tracking tool.

Feature Comparison

• Issue and Bug Tracking: Both Bugzilla and Jira are robust when it comes to issue and bug tracking, but they cater to slightly different needs. Jira has a broader scope and offers extensive features for project management, including Scrum and Kanban boards, sprint planning, and more, making it more suitable for agile development. Bugzilla, on the other hand, primarily focuses on bug tracking and is appreciated for its simplicity and straightforwardness.
• Interface and Usability: Jira's user interface is modern and customizable, but can be complex, leading to a steep learning curve for some. In contrast, Bugzilla's interface is simpler and more straightforward, but it lacks the modern and intuitive feel of Jira's.
• Customizability: Jira shines in its customizability, allowing teams to create custom workflows, fields, and issue types. Bugzilla also allows for customization but is more limited compared to Jira.
• Integration: Jira integrates seamlessly with other Atlassian tools and offers a vast marketplace of add-ons. Bugzilla lacks such extensive integration capabilities but can be integrated with other tools using its REST API.

Pricing Comparison

Jira follows a per-user pricing model with a free plan for small teams and more feature-rich paid plans for larger ones. Bugzilla, as an open-source tool, is free to use, which can make it a cost-effective solution for smaller teams or organizations on a tight budget.

User Feedback

Jira is widely praised for its extensive feature set, although some users find it complex and hard to master. Bugzilla users appreciate its simplicity and effectiveness in bug tracking, but its user interface is often seen as outdated and less user-friendly.

Hygger

Hygger is a product management software that's well-suited for IT teams. It offers Kanban boards, backlog prioritization, and a user-friendly interface that can help manage agile projects efficiently.

Feature Comparison

• Project Management: Jira is a robust tool with a strong focus on agile project management, offering extensive features such as issue and bug tracking, Scrum and Kanban boards, and sprint planning. On the other hand, Hygger also supports agile methodologies with features like Kanban boards and burndown charts, but it differentiates itself with built-in prioritization techniques (like the Value/Effort Matrix) that help teams focus on high-value tasks.
• Interface and Usability: Jira's interface is highly customizable and powerful, but its complexity can present a steep learning curve. Hygger has a cleaner and more intuitive interface that is user-friendly, making it easier for teams to get started.
• Collaboration: Both tools provide collaboration features, but Hygger places a stronger emphasis on simplicity and ease of use. While Jira focuses on issue-based collaboration, Hygger enables collaboration through tasks, projects, and a dedicated comments section.
• Integration: Jira integrates seamlessly with other Atlassian products and a wide variety of third-party tools. Hygger also offers integrations with popular tools such as Slack, Google Drive, and GitHub.

Pricing Comparison

Jira follows a per-user pricing model, with a free plan for small teams and more feature-rich paid plans. Hygger also offers a free plan and follows a similar per-user pricing model for its paid plans, which include more advanced features.

User Feedback

Jira is widely used and recognized in the software development industry. However, some users mention its complexity and steep learning curve as drawbacks.

On the other hand, Hygger users appreciate its intuitive interface, powerful prioritization features, and its user-friendly design.

Backlog

Backlog provides everything needed for a development workflow, including issue and bug tracking, project management, and version control.

Its focus on development workflows makes it an attractive Jira alternative for software development teams.

Feature Comparison

• Project Management: Jira is an agile project management tool equipped with an array of features such as issue tracking, Scrum and Kanban boards, sprint planning, and more. Backlog, while also facilitating agile development, places more emphasis on version control and code review, combining the features of a project management tool and a Git solution in one place.
• Interface and Usability: Jira's interface is highly customizable and powerful, but it can present a steep learning curve due to its complexity. Backlog, in contrast, offers a clean and intuitive interface that's simpler and more user-friendly, making it easier for teams to get up to speed.
• Collaboration: Jira allows issue-based collaboration and integrates with other Atlassian tools to create a comprehensive collaboration environment. Backlog offers issue tracking and task assignment as well, but it stands out by integrating native version control (Git & SVN) and code review tools into the platform, enhancing collaboration for software development teams.
• Integration: Jira shines in its ability to integrate with a plethora of tools and services, with an extensive marketplace of add-ons. Backlog integrates with popular tools as well, such as Slack, Typetalk, and Cacoo, but its scope is narrower compared to Jira's.

Pricing Comparison

Jira employs a per-user pricing model with a free plan for small teams and more extensive, paid plans for larger ones. Backlog also offers a free plan and employs a similar per-user pricing model for its paid plans, which unlock more advanced features.

User Feedback

Jira is acknowledged for its extensive features and customizability, but its complexity can be daunting for some users.

In contrast, Backlog users appreciate its simplicity and combination of project management with version control, but some mention the need for more advanced integrations.

FAQ

What is Jira comparable to?

Jira is comparable to other project management tools like Trello, Asana, VersionOne, Microsoft Azure DevOps, and many more. These tools all offer similar project management features, although each has its unique strengths and specialties.

Does Microsoft have an equivalent of Jira?

Yes, Microsoft's Azure DevOps (formerly Team Foundation Server) serves as an equivalent to Jira, offering a comprehensive suite of tools for project management, bug and issue tracking, and software development.

Is Jira outdated?

Jira remains a relevant and powerful tool, especially for agile project management and software development teams. However, its perceived complexity and pricing structure have led some agile teams to to seek simpler, more affordable alternatives.

Does Google have a Jira equivalent?

While Google does not offer a direct equivalent to Jira, it offers various tools (like Google Tasks and Google Workspace) that can support project management and team collaboration. However, these tools don't match the complexity or feature set of Jira.

Does Jira have any competitors?

Yes, Jira has numerous competitors in the project management space, including Asana, Trello, Monday.com, VersionOne, Microsoft Azure DevOps, Pivotal Tracker, and more.

Who is a competitor to Jira?

There are many competitors to Jira, including Trello, Asana, Pivotal Tracker, Microsoft Azure DevOps, Monday.com, ClickUp, and more.

What is equivalent to Jira in Microsoft?

Microsoft Azure DevOps serves as Microsoft's equivalent to Jira, offering project management, bug tracking, and software development tools.

Is Jira the best agile tool?

While Jira is widely recognized for its robust features supporting agile methodologies, whether it's the best tool will depend on your team's specific needs, size, and budget.

Does Microsoft have a Jira alternative?

Yes, Microsoft's Azure DevOps serves as a solid Jira alternative, especially for teams invested in the Microsoft ecosystem.

What is better than Jira?

There are many alternatives to Jira that some teams may find better, depending on their specific needs. Some of these include Trello (for simplicity), Asana (for user interface), or Microsoft Azure DevOps (for integration with Microsoft products).

What applications are similar to Jira?

Many applications are similar to Jira, including Asana, Trello, Monday.com, Pivotal Tracker, and Microsoft Azure DevOps.

Is there a Microsoft equivalent of Jira?

Yes, Microsoft Azure DevOps is considered an equivalent to Jira in terms of functionality and scope.

Does Google have a tool like Jira?

Google does not offer a direct equivalent to Jira. However, tools within the Google Workspace, like Google Tasks, offer basic task management features.

Is Jira still relevant?

Absolutely. Jira remains a go-to tool for many agile project management and software development teams, although alternatives are increasingly popular.

What is a Jira tool alternative?

There are many alternatives to Jira, including Asana, Trello, Microsoft Azure DevOps, Pivotal Tracker, and more.

What is the difference between Atlassian and Jira?

Atlassian is the company that develops several productivity and collaboration tools, including Jira, Confluence, Bitbucket, and Trello. Jira is a specific product from Atlassian, focusing on cross team collaboration, project management and issue tracking.

Is there a free version of Jira?

Yes, Jira offers a free trial version for up to 10 users. However, the free version has limited features compared to the paid versions.

How many tools are there like Jira?

There are dozens of tools similar to Jira in the market, each offering a unique set of features and strengths. Some of these include Asana, Trello, Monday.com, Pivotal Tracker, Microsoft Azure DevOps, and more.

‍